|
|
Post by mumd on Sept 13, 2014 19:08:43 GMT -5
My guess is that at this point the Stetson people are wondering why they couldn't do things "The Mercer Way". The 2 programs are miles apart.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Sept 14, 2014 17:26:07 GMT -5
My guess is that at this point the Stetson people are wondering why they couldn't do things "The Mercer Way". The 2 programs are miles apart. Perhaps what Stetson is doing is "normal" for a start up program. What we are seeing at Mercer is over the top special and unique. |
|
MU22
Baby Bear
Posts: 38
|
Post by MU22 on Sept 14, 2014 22:10:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by BearDownMU on Sept 14, 2014 22:14:46 GMT -5
I can't imagine what happened after that. I can tell you this, if some other grown man spit on me, my teammates would have had to peel me off of him.
|
|
|
|
Post by jackal on Sept 15, 2014 5:38:26 GMT -5
Oddly enough, Furman had a player ejected on Saturday night for targeting. Lead with the top of his helmet on a play and was tossed from the game.
Not sure if the league treats ejections differently.
|
|
|
|
Post by BearDownMU on Sept 15, 2014 8:35:44 GMT -5
From my research, the SoCon penalty is stiffer than the NCAA. Ejections for fighting or targeting, the player is suspended for the full next game. I don't think this is true for other ejections.
|
|
|
|
Post by jackal on Sept 15, 2014 9:15:13 GMT -5
From my research, the SoCon penalty is stiffer than the NCAA. Ejections for fighting or targeting, the player is suspended for the full next game. I don't think this is true for other ejections. One would assume the SoCon office would have to take a look at it. In the FBS, the referees can overturn the automatic ejection for targeting on the field after video review. |
|
