Is this MU year to take the next step?

You keep talking about things supporting your case, but all you are doing is pointing out scores and a College Sports Madness ranking (that's the source of that "poll") that FUBeAR posted (I think) to be funny, because that poll is bogus. At the time that poll came out, Wofford was #10 or better in every major accepted poll system anyone looks at, STATS, Coaches, etc.

To Jackal's point, it could easily be the case that Mercer has had no business even being close in games, but are an the coaches have coached their tail off. Further more, I could look at all those Wofford wins you posted and make this argument. "Wofford is more talented than any other team in the conference. The fact that they are even in close games proves that their coaches should all be replaced. They should be winning by 30."

By the same margin, should I suggest that, because it was 17-10 with 7 minutes left in the Mercer - Auburn game and Mercer had the ball, that our coaches should be fired because we didn't beat Auburn? We lost 24-10. Was that a close late game failure by the coaching staff?

Point being, you've been saying this for what feels like 2 years and there really isn't a whole lot of substance to why you keep going back to wanting to get the coaches replaced. I'm just tired of talking about it. Have whatever opinion you like. I just personally don't agree with your opinion nor how you go about supporting it.

This is my opinion. For a start up program that just came back 5 years ago, and entered one of the more competitive conferences in all of FCS football, we have been more successful more quickly that anyone would have projected. We have recruited well. We have been more than respectable in FBS games (35-10 loss to Ga Tech and a 24-10 loss to Auburn), we have increased our conference win total every year, and (I think) have gone from, in the eyes of other school in our conference) gone from a brand new football team to a school that is legitimately competitive in the conference. That's all I got.

Lol. Nobody said that. Do you read? I think we were both just pointing out that the methodology by which you reached your conclusion could just as easily be used to reach a completely different conclusion. No one is suggesting that the players are bad or that the coaching is great. You are the one who the whole way has been trying to quantify why the coaches are bad/need to be replaced. My issue is how and why you are reaching that conclusion. What you seem to fail to understand about the last two posts is we are using these examples to attack your method, not your conclusion.

The fact that this pissed you off kinda proves my point. I think the players are good and the coaches are good. Don't represent a position I've never advanced.