|
|
Post by pappabear84 on Oct 20, 2014 12:10:40 GMT -5
If you were the coach, at this point of the season with a 5-3 record and 3 more conference games left, What offensive and Defensive adjustments would you look to make.
(Food for thought, just looking to create some strategic discussion about our team, not intended to create bad vibes are individual call outs!!!)
Example:
Offensively:
1. Increase effectiveness on 3 down conversion rate: Stretch the field go to mid-level to deep passes, will create more room to run up middle, screens etc.
2. Hold all Players accountable for their personal fouls, and like of discipline: Set them out for series or possessions, We have plenty of players that can fill in.
3. Run to Pass ratio is about even now, but maybe redistribute the run to less QB runs, and more RB runs, QB taking Big hits right now.
4. Throw more on 1st down and not 2nd or 3rd. formation of offense on first is predictable.
Defensively:
1. Blitz more to get off the field on 3rd down
2. Bring the corners up to 5 yard cushion versus 7-8 yards
3. Keep the Backers in on 3rd down some, to create pressure.
4. Hold All Players accountable for their personal foul actions.
|
|
|
|
Post by BearDownMU on Oct 20, 2014 13:54:38 GMT -5
Offensively: -I'd like to see us use the TE's more. I haven't heard anything but I know #38 being out hurts. I hope he's back real soon. Big weapon in the passing game. -Got to do a better job taking care of the football. 7 fumbles lost and 7 INT's in 8 games. And quite a few of them were in big spots. -Penalties are a problem all around. I thought we had turned the corner a bit after the Austin Peay game, but we were up to our old tricks again against Western. Fortunately, I think we didn't get killed to badly on the penalties. Also, not to be that guy, but the refs... Holy smokes they missed some big calls this past weekend. -Seems like I've seen less of the little read play the last few weeks? Maybe I'm imagining that. But, yes #7 does take some shots. But he also refuses to go down until he gets tackled, which isn't always the best thing. -Again, this is purely eyeball and might not be supported by reality, but it seems like the last few weeks there has been more edge pressure getting through. Not sure if that's the case, just feels like the QB has been under a little more duress. And that's going to be a big point of emphasis this weekend. Because this guy is a big problem. www.gomocs.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=20497900226.5 career sacks and 42.0 career TFL's. -I know the numbers may not reflect it, but it felt like we were in a bit of a rut offensively all game Saturday. We racked up yards, but struggled scoring points. Defensively -Penalties and turnovers are/were bad this past weekend, but let's be honest. What really hurt us were big plays in the passing game. 33, 39 and 42 yard passes for TD's. And a couple of them looked like there were just hoisted up in the air. Gotta figure that out. -That's probably why you don't see more press coverage or line jams honestly. Just feels like we have a hard time in coverage. -Age old thing, but I'd love to see us get more pressure on the QB. We're next to last in the league in sacks. And pressure also makes your secondary's job a whole lot easier. -Penalties, of course. -I will say I think the defense has improved a lot over the course of the season. So kudos to them for that. |
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Oct 20, 2014 22:55:09 GMT -5
Offensively: -I'd like to see us use the TE's more. I haven't heard anything but I know #38 being out hurts. I hope he's back real soon. Big weapon in the passing game. Thanks for the kind words. He is working hard to get back, but those decisions and announcements are up to the excellent trainers, doctors and coaches. |
|
badnewsbear
Penfield Bear
"May they defend this house like and angry bear defends its den." - C. McMahon
Posts: 51 
|
Post by badnewsbear on Oct 21, 2014 6:56:22 GMT -5
Coming from a guy who knows little about football...
Defense: I don't have the solution but it seems like we cannot get off the field on third downs to save our damn lives. It seems like I hear "Turn down for what" 9000 times a game. So frustrating how we will work so hard and then they will complete a 3rd and 13 pass play to keep the drive alive.
Offense: We need to get back to being balanced. The run is working but it also isn't allowing 7 to get into a rhythm. Also, how many times are they going to call the defunct play where we hike it to the running back before we realize that it didn't work one bit.
Once again, I'm a baseball and basketball guy, but 3rd downs have killed us all season and 7 wasn't able to get into rhythm at all last Saturday.
|
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Oct 21, 2014 8:15:51 GMT -5
Too many DAP's and/or Too many TO's = "Please take a seat with Clayton, Sidney, Mohammed, and Jugdish."
|
|
|
|
Post by catamount87 on Oct 22, 2014 13:22:59 GMT -5
If y'all will allow, this Catamount has some thoughts after last week's game.
Offense:
1) Protect the football! As the old saying goes, lose the football and you'll lose the game.
2) Become more balanced. The offense is tilting towards only relying on Lakes and the running game. The passing game was never much of a threat. Interesting, because there were some excellent passing plays. That said, your QB was a bit too quick to get rid of the ball as soon as he felt any pressure. That extra 1/2 - 1 1/2 second would have made a world of difference. The o-line run blocks well but had trouble with speed rushes when pass blocking.
3) Discipline. Untimely penalties that were flat out mental mistakes were momentum killers. Those two consecutive false start penalties were brutal. The second should have earn that young man an a-- chewing. Same thing for that personal foul penalty early in the game that took a TD opportunity to a FG opportunity. BTW, Posey was responsible in both instances I mentioned.
4) Execution. This goes hand-in-hand with #2. It also has to do with experience, especially against better competition which will exploit even the smallest lapses in execution.
Defense:
1) Speed. At times, the LBs and DBs looked about a 1/2 step slow.
2) Pass rushing. The d-line and LBs never really pressured our QB. They didn't react well once he ran either.
3) DB size. Honestly, they played well but with two NFL sized receivers we were able to exploit the size advantage. (BTW, I think we suffer the same DB size issue too.)
All in all, I was impressed with y'all. I knew you'd be a well coached team that would be competitive. Really the biggest thing I saw was inexperience.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Oct 22, 2014 16:27:20 GMT -5
If y'all will allow, this Catamount has some thoughts after last week's game. Offense: 1) Protect the football! As the old saying goes, lose the football and you'll lose the game. 2) Become more balanced. The offense is tilting towards only relying on Lakes and the running game. The passing game was never much of a threat. Interesting, because there were some excellent passing plays. That said, your QB was a bit too quick to get rid of the ball as soon as he felt any pressure. That extra 1/2 - 1 1/2 second would have made a world of difference. The o-line run blocks well but had trouble with speed rushes when pass blocking. 3) Discipline. Untimely penalties that were flat out mental mistakes were momentum killers. Those two consecutive false start penalties were brutal. The second should have earn that young man an a-- chewing. Same thing for that personal foul penalty early in the game that took a TD opportunity to a FG opportunity. BTW, Posey was responsible in both instances I mentioned. 4) Execution. This goes hand-in-hand with #2. It also has to do with experience, especially against better competition which will exploit even the smallest lapses in execution. Defense: 1) Speed. At times, the LBs and DBs looked about a 1/2 step slow. 2) Pass rushing. The d-line and LBs never really pressured our QB. They didn't react well once he ran either. 3) DB size. Honestly, they played well but with two NFL sized receivers we were able to exploit the size advantage. (BTW, I think we suffer the same DB size issue too.) All in all, I was impressed with y'all. I knew you'd be a well coached team that would be competitive. Really the biggest thing I saw was inexperience. I agree with some of this, particularly the turnovers and penalties. I think what is frustrating to most Mercer fans here is that we had much fewer penalties and turnovers last year with a more inexperienced team. Our TO's are up 75% and penalty yards are up 54% compared to the same 8 games a year ago. Granted the competition is stiffer, but that does not account for all the increase IMHO. Additionally, since the yards gained by both teams was essentially equal, I am less inclined to agree with the "execution" points. Mercer is going to have to win the TO stat and the Penalty stat to win in the SoCon. In my opinion, the game Saturday would have been close to even had they done so. |
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Oct 23, 2014 1:11:01 GMT -5
If y'all will allow, this Catamount has some thoughts after last week's game. Offense: 1) Protect the football! As the old saying goes, lose the football and you'll lose the game. - DING! DING! DING! WINNER, WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!2) Become more balanced.  - 202 YPG PASSING 218 YPG RUSHING - SEEMS PRETTY DARN BALANCED TO METhe offense is tilting towards only relying on Lakes and the running game. - OK - STATS DON'T SAY THAT, BUT I'LL TAKE 5.3 TEAM YPC & 6.3 YPC BY MR. LAKES 8 DAYS/WEEK (5.0 & 6.0 RESPECTIVELY VS. THE CATS). IF I CAN GET THOSE STATS ON EVERY PLAY, I'LL NEVER THROW THE FOOTBALL - DON'T NEED TO.The passing game was never much of a threat. - MAYBE, RUSS THREW FOR MORE YD'S THAN MITCHELL & THE SAME # OF COMPLETIONS. HAD 2 DROPPED AND WAS HIT ON ANOTHER - DID NOT HAVE THE TD'S THOUGH - MISSING WHAT #38 DOES FOR THE MU PASSING OFFENSE A LOT!!! WILL BE GLAD TO SEE HIM BACK SOON!!!! Interesting, because there were some excellent passing plays. - AGREED, BUT NOT ENOUGH OF THEM (SEE ABOVE - #38 CHANGES THAT IN A LOT OF WAY - SOME SEEN, MOSTLY UNSEEN) That said, your QB was a bit too quick to get rid of the ball as soon as he felt any pressure. That extra 1/2 - 1 1/2 second would have made a world of difference. - HE RELEASED THE BALL 1X A LITTLE EARLY WITH TOO MUCH ZIP ON WHAT MAY HAVE BEEN A TD, BUT HE WAS HIT AS HE RELEASED THE BALL - THE MAN WHO HIT HIM WAS NOT AN O-LINEMAN'S MAN (MORE ON THAT BELOW)
The o-line run blocks well but had trouble with speed rushes when pass blocking. - NONE OF THE 3 SACKS WERE 'GIVEN UP' BY O-LINEMAN -2 BY RB'S AND 1 BY A TE. THERE WAS 1 OCCASION WHERE OUR OT GAVE UP A QB HURRY/HIT & THE BALL WENT OFF TARGET INTO THE TURF. THE PASSPRO SCHEME IS DESIGNED TO HAVE THOSE DE'S BE TAKEN PAST THE QB WHICH MAY LOOK LIKE EDGE PRESSURE & SPEED RUSHES, BUT IT'S USUALLY NOT A THREAT - AS LONG AS THE GUYS IN THE MIDDLE KEEP THINGS IN FRONT OF THEM WHICH THEY DID, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 2X AND THE QB SCRAMBLED FOR POSITIVE YARDS ON THOSE. SOME NAKED BOOTS ARE DESIGNED TO EXPECT EDGE PRESSURE IF THE DE DOESN'T 'CHASE' AND THAT HAPPENED. SOMETIMES THE H-BACK WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SEALING THE EDGE FROM THE OTHER SIDE AND THAT WASN'T CLEAN EVERY TIME. OUR (FR & FUTURE ALL-SOCON) OT DIDN'T HAVE HIS BEST DAY IN PASSPRO AND THERE WAS SOME LATE PRESSURE DUE TO THAT...AND THERE WERE A FEW OTHER SLIGHTLY 'MESSY' PASSPRO PLAYS, BUT FOR THE MOST PART, THE OL DID JUST FINE EXECUTING THEIR ASSIGNMENTS ON PASS PLAYS...AND RUNNING PLAYS. MERCER's OFFENSIVE STATS (400 YARDS) & WCU's DEFENSIVE STATS BEAR THAT OUT - 7 OF THE TOP 11 CATS TACKLERS WERE DB's.3) Discipline. Untimely penalties that were flat out mental mistakes were momentum killers. THE PENALTIES THAT MU WAS CALLED FOR WERE KILLERS Those two consecutive false start penalties were brutal. The second should have earn that young man an a-- chewing. - THE 2ND FALSE START WAS AN ALMOST IMPERCEPTIBLE OPENING OF HIS HIPS AND SLIGHT WOBBLE OF HIS LEFT KNEE BY THE OT. (NOT THE SAME OT WHO CLEARLY MOVED ON THE 1ST CALL.) HE DID NOT MOVE HIS FEET NOR HIS UPPER BODY AT ALL. THE OFFICIAL WHO CALLED THAT MUST BE A MARINE SHARP SHOOTER. HE DID MOVE THOUGH, SO FINE...GOOD CALL. WE'LL KEEP THAT YOUNGIN' & I'M SURE IF HIS BUTT WAS CHEWED, HE TOOK IT WELL AND WILL BE BETTER FOR IT. BTW - THE LATER ILLEGAL SNAP CALL WAS SOMETHING (AND THE ONLY OFFICIATING 'ISSUE' THAT I'M GOING TO OPENLY COMPLAIN ABOUT) - IT WAS CALLED BY THE LINESMAN, 25 YARDS AWAY ON THE WCU SIDELINE WITH HIS VIEW SCREENED BY WR's AND OTHER OL-MEN, NOT BY THE UMPIRE WHO WAS 3 YARDS FROM AND WITH AN UNIMPEDED VIEW OF MERCER'S CENTER. IT WAS CALLED WHEN THE CENTER, AS CENTERS DO, WAS COMMUNICATING THE LINE CALLS AND NODDED HIS HEAD WHILE HE WAS LOOKING 90 DEGREES TO HIS LEFT AT THE LG. THAT CALL WAS SOMETHING ALL RIGHT - SOMETHING THE RHYMES WITH FULLSPIT! Same thing for that personal foul penalty early in the game that took a TD opportunity to a FG opportunity. BTW, (I THINK, INSTEAD OF HIS NAME, YOU MEANT TO SAY) A FINE YOUNG STUDENT-ATHLETE WHO WORKS COUNTLESS HOURS AT A FULL-TIME JOB (FOOTBALL) FOR VERY LOW PAY/HOUR (HIS SCHOLARSHIP) was responsible in both instances I mentioned. - PF WAS BAD. I CAN'T IMAGINE WHY AN OL-MAN WOULD DO THAT. I WAS SHOCKED WHEN JUST A FEW PLAYS LATER I SAW A CAT O-LINEMAN DO THE SAME THING...AND THEN A FEW MORE PLAYS LATER ANOTHER CAT O-LINEMAN DID IT AS WELL...THIS TIME FROM BEHIND THOUGH AS THE DEFENDER WAS DOWN ON HIS HANDS & KNEES (I THINK I HEARD DUELING BANJOS PLAYING IN THE DISTANCE WHEN I SAW THAT). MUST BE SOME KIND OF NEW O-LINE TREND - NEEDS TO STOP AND THE OFFICIALS NEED TO CALL IT EVERY TIME IT HAPPENS4) Execution. This goes hand-in-hand with #2. It also has to do with experience, especially against better competition which will exploit even the smallest lapses in execution. I'D SAY IT GOES MORE WITH #3, BUT I AGREE - THE BEARS NEED TO EXECUTE BETTER AT ALL POSITIONS, INCLUDING IN THE OL (SEE I'M NOT COMPLETELY AN OL "HOMER")Defense: 1) Speed. At times, the LBs and DBs looked about a 1/2 step slow. - MISSING A COUPLE OF STARTERS THERE (AS MOST TEAMS ARE THIS TIME OF YEAR). LOVE 'EM ALL TO BE FASTER, BUT I THINK YOU CAN POINT BACK UP TO #4 FOR THE OFFENSE ON THIS ONE AS WELL & ADD TECHNIQUE, CUZ IT AIN'T ALL ABOUT THE SPEED. SPEED KILLS, BUT LESS THAN PERFECT TECHNIQUE KILLS YOU JUST AS DEAD, PARTICULARLY IF YOU ARE A 1/2 STEP SLOW.2) Pass rushing. The d-line and LBs never really pressured our QB. - NOT SURE, BUT I DON'T THINK THE GAME PLAN WAS TO TRY TO PUT A LOT OF "LET'S SACK HIM" PRESSURE ON HIM. HE'S NOT A FANTASTIC THROW-THE-BALL-DOWN-THE-FIELD PASSER EVEN WHEN HIS SHOULDER IS 100%, SO I THINK THE PLAN WAS TO PRESSURE HIM ENOUGH TO MAKE HIM THROW AND THEN HOPE HE'S OFF TARGET OR TACKLE THE GUY HE THREW THE BUBBLE SCREEN TO WITH THE GUYS THAT DIDN'T RUSH. NOT A BAD PLAN AND WITH A BIT BETTER EXECUTION - PLAYING THE BALL IN THE AIR BETTER/SHEDDING THE REALLY LATCHED-ON WR BLOCKS BETTER/TACKLING BETTER...IT MIGHT HAVE WORKED A BIT BETTER. MERCER WAS BLITZING SOME, BUT IT WAS MORE OF A DELAYED BLITZ WITH 1 OF THE OLB'S, & RUSHING 4 AND OCCASIONALLY BOTH OLB'S OR 1 AND AN ILB TO SEND 5. PERHAPS THE MAN-TO-MAN MATCH-UPS WITH #8 THAT SENDING MORE, MORE OFTEN WOULD HAVE CAUSED WERE LESS APPEALING TO THE MERCER D COACHES AND THEY MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT. ALSO, THERE WAS A LOT OF REALLY LATCHED-ON PASSPRO BY THE CATS OL AND THAT MAKES GETTING PRESSURE ON THE QB PRETTY TOUGH FOR ANY DEFENSE.They didn't react well once he ran either. - LOL, I NOTICE A LOT OF TEAMS HAVE THAT PROBLEM WITH HIM. I THINK THAT'S MORE A TESTAMENT TO HIS ABILITY THAN A LACK OF EXECUTION/PERFORMANCE ON THE BEAR'S PART - HE HAS GREAT INSTINCTS, IS QUICK, PRETTY FAST, AND RUNS HARD.3) DB size. Honestly, they played well but with two NFL sized receivers we were able to exploit the size advantage. (BTW, I think we suffer the same DB size issue too.) I DON'T KNOW - YEAH SOME OF MU'S DB'S ARE SMALLISH, BUT WAS IT REALLY THAT MUCH OF A FACTOR ON ANY PLAY OTHER THAN THE LAST TD? AND EVEN ON THAT ONE, IT SEEMED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS MORE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN MU'S SAFETY'S HANDS THAN HIS SIZE. HE IS 6-0/195 - NOT TOO SMALL FOR A SOCON SAFETY. MAYBE, DUE TO THEIR SIZE, MU'S DB'S HAD TO PLAY TOO FAR OFF THE BALL OR SOMETHING - SECONDARY PLAY IS NOT MY MAJOR...All in all, I was impressed with y'all. - THANKS - GOOD TO HEAR - DOESN'T HELP MUCH, BUT STILL GOOD. I'M NOT TRYING TO 'ARGUE' EITHER, I HAVE JUST WATCHED THE ESPN3 VID NOW ABOUT 20 TIMES, SO I THOUGHT I MIGHT SHARE WHAT I SEE I knew you'd be a well coached team that would be competitive. - SEE ABOVEReally the biggest thing I saw was inexperience. - NAH, CAN'T AGREE THERE - THEY AIN'T AS YOUNG AS EVERYONE THINKS AND MOST OF THEM THAT ARE YOUNG COME FROM TOP GA & FL HS PROGRAMS - WAY GOOD BALL! - THEY'RE COLLEGE GAME-READY AND (NOW) GAME EXP'D...JUST GOTTA PLAY UP TO THEIR POTENTIAL AND EXECUTE WITH DISCIPLINE.Y'all know I gotta stick up for my OL boyz a little bit...my comments are interspersed above in BOLD ALL CAPS |
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Oct 23, 2014 8:20:50 GMT -5
FUBeAR- what were your thoughts on the holding call on Curtis' KO TD? The flag was thrown by the ref who was 40 yards away from the play. It appears to me on the replay that after making contact the WCU player turns his back and the Mercer player then releases. Unless that is not what the ref was calling from 40 yards away but that was the direction he threw the flag. I'm just not seeing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Oct 23, 2014 8:30:34 GMT -5
FUBeAR- what were your thoughts on the holding call on Curtis' KO TD? The flag was thrown by the ref who was 40 yards away from the play. It appears to me on the replay that after making contact the WCU player turns his back and the Mercer player then releases. Unless that is not what the ref was calling from 40 yards away but that was the direction he threw the flag. I'm just not seeing it. Our view in the stands was about as good as the official's who made the call. The spot of the foul was very far away from the ball. But...if he saw holding, then he saw holding. Both players went to the ground...coulda certainly been dragged down...or not. Probably the same Marine Sharp Shooter that saw the OT's almost imperceptible hip & knee movement an instant before the snap in the 1-2 False start calls made as the Bears were threatening. In addition to his fantastic vision, he also has a better arm than both QB's that played. That flag was a frozen rope all 40 yards that it traveled. |
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Oct 23, 2014 9:01:54 GMT -5
FUBeAR- what were your thoughts on the holding call on Curtis' KO TD? The flag was thrown by the ref who was 40 yards away from the play. It appears to me on the replay that after making contact the WCU player turns his back and the Mercer player then releases. Unless that is not what the ref was calling from 40 yards away but that was the direction he threw the flag. I'm just not seeing it. Our view in the stands was about as good as the official's who made the call. The spot of the foul was very far away from the ball. But...if he saw holding, then he saw holding. Both players went to the ground...coulda certainly been dragged down...or not. Probably the same Marine Sharp Shooter that saw the OT's almost imperceptible hip & knee movement an instant before the snap in the 1-2 False start calls made as the Bears were threatening. In addition to his fantastic vision, he also has a better arm than both QB's that played. That flag was a frozen rope all 40 yards that it traveled. Then that is a different play than I thought . I'll go back and watch again. |
|
|
|
Post by paward on Oct 23, 2014 18:59:02 GMT -5
Great thread. Good to see Bear fans and guest have some good football dialogue.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Oct 23, 2014 19:51:35 GMT -5
Our view in the stands was about as good as the official's who made the call. The spot of the foul was very far away from the ball. But...if he saw holding, then he saw holding. Both players went to the ground...coulda certainly been dragged down...or not. Probably the same Marine Sharp Shooter that saw the OT's almost imperceptible hip & knee movement an instant before the snap in the 1-2 False start calls made as the Bears were threatening. In addition to his fantastic vision, he also has a better arm than both QB's that played. That flag was a frozen rope all 40 yards that it traveled. Then that is a different play than I thought . I'll go back and watch again. Here is the replay of C. Curtis' KO return for a TD that was called back for holding. The flag was thrown from 40 yards away in the direction of the Mercer player at the bottom of the the screen ( or the player who is farthest away from the play). Can anyone see holding on this play? www.youtube.com/watch?v=naq_nLChriE&feature=youtu.be |
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Oct 24, 2014 0:13:09 GMT -5
Then that is a different play than I thought . I'll go back and watch again. Here is the replay of C. Curtis' KO return for a TD that was called back for holding. The flag was thrown from 40 yards away in the direction of the Mercer player at the bottom of the the screen ( or the player who is farthest away from the play). Can anyone see holding on this play? www.youtube.com/watch?v=naq_nLChriE&feature=youtu.beAt :09, you see the 'flash' of a WCU all-white clad player entering the picture at the far right of the screen, about 1/2 up from the bottom. When you see him, he is on the ground and quickly pops to his feet. That player is #51, who is on the hash in the pre-kick alignment. After he pops to his feet, you can see, at the 25 yard line, the black-clad Mercer player, who was under him when they both went to the ground. The called holding has already occurred before they enter the screen. I believe what happened was the Mercer player went to block #51, then the Cat player who started on the other side of the kicker (can't pick up his number - #52, maybe) was blocked into the legs of the Mercer player blocking #51 at the same time he was contacting #51, resulting in him falling suddenly and awkwardly, with #51 coming down with him. The Mercer player may have reflexively 'grabbed' onto 'something' (#51's jersey) as he was unexpectedly falling (like grabbing for the banister when you, or maybe that's just me, start to fall down the steps). Or, they may have both just been knocked down suddenly by the force of the collision with 2 other players. The ref (apparently Doug Williams or his twin brother..with that arm) thought it looked like holding from his vantage point 35 or so yards from the spot, so he threw the flag. I have spent a lot of Friday nights on the sidelines and the thing that bothers me most about officials (who, by and large, do an amazing job...that I would never even consider doing!) is when they call what they THINK they saw, rather than what they ACTUALLY saw. Sometimes players are blocked in such a way that the body movement looks like it does when players are held, and the refs see the body movement, so they call holding...even though they don't actually see the 'hold'...because there was no holding. This also happens a lot on PI (both ways - O & D). I'm not saying that happened in this case, but it does happen a lot; maybe he actually saw Holding instead of thinking he saw Holding, but he did throw that flag a LONG way...props on the throw though - great shoulder rotation, squared his hips, followed through, finishing with full extension toward the target! |
|
|
|
Post by Mocs Eye on Oct 24, 2014 10:28:38 GMT -5
Whoever put up that Animal House clip should be awarded with some kind of medal! Awesome...ended up watching 3 more clips!
|
|
- 202 YPG PASSING 218 YPG RUSHING - SEEMS PRETTY DARN BALANCED TO ME