|
Post by orangeandblack on Nov 1, 2014 18:30:03 GMT -5
Has anyone been watching some of these this year? I think our camerawork is great and the picture is crisp. However, the on-screen graphics and announcers really bother me during the broadcast. Several mistakes with the graphics that indicate the booth might be good at doing a broadcast, but not in tune with football's rules? If you tuned in with 2:04 to go in the game, you'd think Mercer had 3 timeouts left and Citadel 0. Unfortunately you'd be very upset to learn that Citadel had 3 timeouts and Mercer 0. It was further exaggerated when Citadel took a timeout and the new display said Citadel 0 timeouts, Mercer 2.
The announcers have been solid, but I just never get the feeling that they're "all-in" with Mercer. The general tone is a bit of indifference. For reference, our radio man is absolutely ALL IN with Mercer. There is 0% doubt that he bleeds orange and black. DJ Shockley being a UGA man hurts his image rooting for Mercer, and the other man is downright excited when the other team scores by yelling "TOUCHDOWN!". If I was out of the room I'd be stunned to learn that was an away team score.
Overall I'm thrilled we have ESPN3 in place, and I hope our broadcasts improve moving forward. Some viewers may be tuning in for the first time and I'd hate to have it be their last time.
|
|
|
Post by mumd on Nov 1, 2014 21:12:18 GMT -5
It's been my impression that the commentators are trying to be "neutral", even though that would be hard to do if you were calling the same team's games week after week. There is a delay on either the radio or the TV broadcast, I can't remember which. Otherwise I'd put Cameron on with the video feed, like Dawg fans used to do with Munson.
|
|
|
Post by underscorex on Nov 2, 2014 9:55:58 GMT -5
I'd imagine they're under orders from ESPN to be neutral, honestly. That's generally par for the course with TV announcers, jokes about Verne and Gary aside. That way fans of both teams can watch the broadcast, journalistic neutrality, etc.
|
|
|
Post by orangeandblack on Nov 2, 2014 17:03:52 GMT -5
As for ESPN wanting neutral broadcasters, I could see that being the case. I was hoping since Mercer produces the broadcast themselves that would not be a requirement. I absolutely want balanced analysis, but there should not be excitement for the opposing team doing well.
As you said mumd, I've tried to overlay the radio and the video before... but it just didn't line up well enough.
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Nov 2, 2014 18:43:20 GMT -5
I'm not sure why the radio and TV are so far off. Sometimes it is 2 plays off, but usually at least one play. That is about 30-45 seconds. I would think if the radio would delay their broadcast to sync up with the ESPN3, they would increase their listening audience by a lot.
|
|
|
Post by BearDownMU on Nov 2, 2014 19:09:45 GMT -5
I could give you the IT reason for this issue... But no one cares... lol!
|
|
|
Post by bear38 on Nov 2, 2014 19:12:45 GMT -5
I could give you the IT reason for this issue... But no one cares... lol! Is there any technology out there that will delay the radio broadcast for me? I would love to do that.
|
|