|
|
Post by BearDownMU on Sept 11, 2016 23:25:57 GMT -5
Well, maybe we'll get to play you guys again some time in the future. Then we'll have more than 3 years of scholarship football under our belts and maybe, juuuuust maybe, we will keep you from scoring at will.
|
|
|
|
Post by BearDownMU on Sept 11, 2016 23:27:24 GMT -5
Lol. I do love me some FUBeAR
|
|
|
|
Post by GT on Sept 11, 2016 23:35:49 GMT -5
Ok..... Did we not say for most of the second half? We still rotated our second string guys in a whole lot is the point. Go watch us vs Boston college, we had two offensive linemen that didn't come out of the game. You are obviously ignoring evwrything else, so I'm done, have a great season guys. |
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Sept 12, 2016 0:58:28 GMT -5
Tech did pull the starters at halftime... |
|
|
|
Post by GT on Sept 12, 2016 11:45:14 GMT -5
Tech did pull the starters at halftime... Maybe next time ill elaborate, yes they played starters in the second have but for the most part they were not in the game down after down it was a ton of rotating that we did not do when playing mercer, you are still missing my point and ignoring every other fact I have. I honestly was not trying to start anything, have a great season guys. |
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Sept 12, 2016 12:26:04 GMT -5
Maybe next time ill elaborate, yes they played starters in the second have but for the most part they were not in the game down after down it was a ton of rotating that we did not do when playing mercer, you are still missing my point and ignoring every other fact I have. I honestly was not trying to start anything, have a great season guys. Prior to the fumble on the 2 yardline in the 4th quarter, #75 played a possession at RG and #67 played part of a possession. There were no other O-Line substitutions prior to about 6 minutes remaining in the 4th quarter. 4 A-Backs listed as Starters on the depth chart rotated, as they always do, bringing in the plays, until this time, as well, with perhaps a couple of exceptions for a play or 2. WR's rolled from 1's to 2's a bit earlier, but with a lead and a back-up QB in the game, who did not attempt a pass; I don't think that was a major concern. In many cases, I imagine the #2 WR's might be better and more enthusiastic run-blockers anyway. There was, perhaps, a bit more substitution on the D, but not much more. The 2's played as you would expect on a 90+ degree day. Mercer was rolling 3 deep on the DL from the beginning of the game. The 'wholesale' substitution of the GT D also came after the fumble. If you want to TRY to continue to make your argument, go here Mercer @ GT - ESPN3/ACCNetwork Extra Replay - watch the game, and chart the players in the game for both Teams on every play. You have stated no 'facts.' You are typing what you would like to think happened. I've provided visual evidence refuting your assertion as well as some additional specifics around who substituted and when. If you want anyone on this board to be convinced that you are correct...and, apparently, it IS very important to you....stop repeating the same vague assertion and bring some documentation to be considered - 22 players x 130 plays (Just O & D; don't even worry about ST's) = 2,860 data points which will PROVE you are right...or not. Otherwise, consider moving along... |
|
|
|
Post by FUBeAR on Sept 13, 2016 17:52:40 GMT -5
Let's have a contest. Count the number of Illegal High/Low Blocks in these videos. [HINT: Don't listen to the Narrator for your info - use your eyes]
BTW - for the 2nd straight week, playing against offenses that use an abundance of low-blocking, no Illegal Blocking penalties were called.
BTW2 - El Cid was called for 2 Illegal Blocks early in their game against Furman, the week after the Bulldogs game with Mercer.
First, some definitions & interpretations directly from the "NCAA - Football - 2016-2017 Rules & Interpretations Manual" so you'll know the rules, apparently, better than ACC (and SoCon) Officials do...
DEFINITION
Chop Block
ARTICLE 3. A chop block is a high-low or low-high combination block by any two players against an opponent (not the ball carrier) anywhere on the field, with or without a delay between blocks; the “low” component is at the opponent’s thigh or below.
INTERPRETATIONS
Chop Blocking—ARTICLE 10
Approved Ruling 9-1-10
I. On a forward pass play, A75 is blocking B66 at the waist behind the neutral zone. While A75 maintains contact, A47 subsequently blocks B66 at his thigh. RULING: Chop block, 15 yards from the previous spot.
II. As the flow of the play moves to the left, right tackle A77 is disengaging from his block above the thigh with B50 when A27 blocks B50 at his knee. RULING: Chop block, 15 yards. Previous spot enforcement if the foul occurs behind the neutral zone.
III. Immediately after the snap, left guard A65 and left tackle A79 simultaneously block B66, who is in the neutral zone. (a) Both blocks are at the thigh. (b) One contact is at the waist and the other at the knee. RULING: (a) Legal blocks for a low-low combination. (b) Foul, chop block.
IV. Tight end A87 and wingback A43 are leading the play when both simultaneously block linebacker B17, who is three yards beyond the neutral zone. (a) Both blocks are above the waist. (b) One block is above the waist and the other at the knee. RULING: (a) Legal blocks. (b) Foul, chop block.
|
|
